Some people are going nuts over this card. What do you guys think?
View Separately

Some people are going nuts over this card. What do you guys think?

58 Notes/ Hide

  1. asian-nerd-resides-here reblogged this from hautemagic
  2. teddymedt answered: I think nuts.
  3. iamclearlyawizard reblogged this from vedalkenghurl and added:
    Seems like a cool dude, is a 3 mana 4/4 flier and isn’t afraid of anything.
  4. winmill answered: A 4/4 flyer for three? Eh. No crazy effects… Seems alright, I guess.
  5. thearcbound answered: Personally I don’t like it. At minimum it is a 4 cost angel with flying. As far as 4 drop uncommons go I’m sure there are better ones.
  6. sirlamelot reblogged this from flinnisteridius and added:
    qué pedazo de carta!
  7. mistermcb answered: I like the art
  8. sprucezeus answered: Reminds me of Talara’s Battalion, from Eventide. I also really like its typing. Does seem a bit odd having a card like this in Blue though.
  9. sleepingwarrior28 reblogged this from vedalkenghurl and added:
    Gotta love the art. - Sleeping Warrior
  10. volpalope answered: That’s….pretty cool, actually! I find Illusion Tribal interesting, and enjoy the illusions that don’t die once targeted :P
  11. tricksterwizardry reblogged this from vedalkenghurl
  12. phalanxrobot answered: It’s still a cheap blue beater with evasion. Works for me :)
  13. romanticjester answered: I wanted a playset just after looking at the art, it’s so purdy.
  14. lenapoo reblogged this from seanienachos and added:
    dammit, i want someone to teach me this fucking game.
  15. gay-as-an-arrow reblogged this from vedalkenghurl
  16. hautemagic reblogged this from mtgfan and added:
    Slightly older players will remember the hype behind Talara’s Battalion and also remember how not playable she actually...
  17. packeymcmay answered: Sigh, this type of card is so boring. Please.
  18. theillusionofsubstance answered: I see plenty of interaction with Lord of the Unreal. It’s basically a 5/5 Invisible Stalker at that point, and also an Angel.
  19. vedalkenghurl reblogged this from mtgfan and added:
    Sooooooo pumped!!!
  20. millennialsentinel answered: Eh I’d say it’s pretty good but not Delver level
  21. coolflashyname said: I wish I could re-edit my answer. It’s just the Phantasmal dragon without the draw back and replacing it with being forced to be cast second. It’s great for an illusion based deck but it’s kind of meh.
  22. seanienachos reblogged this from mtgfan and added:
    Because it’s a 4/4 flying for 2U, so it’s splashable, it’s in the best color and it has the best evasion next to shroud....
  23. thatnerdychef answered: Cheap flyer I suppose. Outside of that, I have no idea.
  24. keepyourwordsalive answered: I like it, but I want to buy Vela’s deck ):
  25. wolflog reblogged this from mtgfan and added:
    I like it, an illusion that doesn’t fall apart when...target it! ^_^ and a 4/4 flyer for...
  26. mtgfan reblogged this from mtgfan and added:
    Remember, it isn’t Ponder, then Illusory Angel for free. It’s cast something, then cast her for 2U. It doesn’t make her...
  27. krakenstein answered: pay 1+3 or 0 and get a 4/4 with flying…..Good deal
  28. acruelultimatum answered: ponder, illusory angel. preordain, illusory angel. probe, illusory angel. you can do so much.
  29. pandatier answered: Bant aggro bight like it. Dunno who else though
  30. coolflashyname answered: Its a three mana 4/4 flier. It’s Phantasmal Dragon without the “I fizzle at the sight of a spell” but can only be cast as a second spell.
  31. polishtamales answered: If she had Flash, I’d be all over this. I’m whelmed, but I feel UU for a 4/4 would be more attractive for both casual and Legacy use..
  32. makimonstrous answered: The artwork is fantastic.
  33. creatormegara answered: Um… I think this card is completely over powered.

Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...